Site logo
Natural Science, Biology, 2024, 14, 67–75
DOI: 10.xxxx/example-doi Special Issue 1(2), 2022 186–1928

Philosophical and Theoretical Aspects of Court-Notary Interaction: Current Relationships in the Provision of Evidence

Received N/A; revised N/A; accepted N/A
CC BY-NC 4.0 This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

The article examines the modern relationship be-tween the interactionof the court and the notary when taking measures to ensure evidence. In particular, it is indicated that when providing evidence, these bodies are guided by the norms of civil procedural legislation and implement similar goals aimed at fixing factual circumstances of legal signifi-cance in a procedural form. It is emphasized that their compe-tence touches, moreover, the notary, as it were, replaces the court in the implementation of interim measures. One of the tasks of the effective activity of the notary is to relieve the ju-dicial system from the consideration of local and time-consuming issues, which are solved, as a rule, without the ap-plication of the principle of adversarial parties, including the provision of evidence on the Internet. Thus, the potential of unloading the court is excluded from its competence to solve problems that do not relate to the administration of justice.

Subscribe to TheGufo Newsletter​