mailto:[email protected] · Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India · Senior Resident, Department of Dentistry, Sree Gokulam Medical College& Research Foundation Venjaramoodu PO,Trivandrum,PIN-695607 Kerala, India · Department Of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, Karnataka, India · .Senior Lecturer, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry Royal Dental College, Palakkad, Kerala, India · Senior Lecturer, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Nandha Dental College and Hospital, Pitchandampalayam Post, Erode, 638052, Tamilnadu, India
Objective: The study objective was to compare the alterations in microhardness and surface roughness (SR) of three
distinct resin-based restorations commonly employed in pediatric dentistry under continuous exposure (at baseline, 7, 14, and 21 days) to frequently utilized pediatric syrups.
Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, three pediatric syrups used as immersion agents were
amoxicillin+clavulanic acid, paracetamol, and haematinic syrup. The materials evaluated were Compomer,
Microhybrid, and Nanofill composite resin restorations. The study included 180 caries-free, non-restored deciduous
molar teeth without developmental anomalies that were extracted due to pre-shedding mobility. The surface
microhardness and SR were measured with a Vickers microhardness durometer and a contact profilometer
respectively. ANOVA was used for intra- and inter-group data comparisons at a 5% significance level using SPSS
software.
Results: On day 21, the antibiotic-micro-hybrid group had the highest microhardness (52.95±0.62). The compomerhematinic group had the lowest microhardness (13.22±0.33). The SR of the compomer-paracetamol group was the highest (1.47±0.43), while the micro-hybrid-antibiotic group had the lowest (0.83±0.07). Intragroup comparisons showed significant differences (p<0.01), showing a decrease in material microhardness with an increased exposure period. The compomer subgroups exposed to paracetamol and haematinic and the nanofill composite exposed to haematinic syrup exhibited a significant difference (p<0.01).
Conclusion: The microhardness of compomer-paracetamol, compomer-antibiotic, and nanofill-paracetamol
subgroups increased over the study period. The SR of the compomer and nanofill materials treated with haematinic
syrup and compomer-paracetamol subgroup increased considerably.
Hi! I can explain how to publish or share, find articles in your field, format citations and answer questions about fees and licensing. How can I help?
Answers are based on The Gufo’s published policies. Editorial decisions are made by the editorial team.