Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
ISSN 1829-006X
2025; 74–81
Shared with The Gufo

FLUORIDE PENETRATION DEPTH AND ITS IMPACT ON WHITE SPOT LESIONS AND MOLAR INCISOR HYPO-MINERALIZATION: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Received: 2026-04-08 · Published: 2025-03-20

Shared article.
Original title
FLUORIDE PENETRATION DEPTH AND ITS IMPACT ON WHITE SPOT LESIONS AND MOLAR INCISOR HYPO-MINERALIZATION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Author
Abir Ishac
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-03-20
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.3-74

Abstract

Background: Fluoride (F) is an effective anticaries agent and can be delivered through various mediums at different concentrations. A pivotal aspect of fluoride’s effectiveness is its ability to penetrate enamel, impacting its remineralizing potential but limited comparative data exists on their effects on lesion depth. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of topical fluoride on lesion depth specifically by comparing its effects on white spot lesions and Molar Incisor Hypo-mineralization (MIH). Material and Methods: Literature review included 16 references dated from 2021 to 2024. The articles were divided into 6 clinical studies analyzing the Fluoride effect on enamel lesions and 4 articles treating its effect on MIH lesions. In addition, 4 studies revealing depth of enamel lesions and a reviewing of EAPD and ICDAS international guidelines. Results: In healthy enamel and early carious lesions such as white spot lesions (WSLs), fluoride primarily acts on the superficial layers, typically within the outer 30-50 μm, promoting remineralization and inhibiting demineralization. However, deeper penetration is often limited, making fluoride less effective in reversing more advanced subsurface demineralization. In contrast, molar incisor hypo-mineralization (MIH) affected enamel is structurally compromised, with porosities extending much deeper (often beyond 300 𝜇m), making it less receptive to conventional fluoride treatments. Conclusion: Although Fluoride is frequently recommended, its remineralization effect on MIH lesions is limited, whereas it has been proven effective on white spot lesions.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates