Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
ISSN 1829-006X
2025; 179–190
Shared with The Gufo

THE EFFICACY OF LASER THERAPY IN LABIAL FRENULECTOMY COMPARED WITH CONVETIONAL SURGERY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Giulia Maria Nicoletti*

Received: 2026-04-08 · Published: 2025-05-15

© 2025 The Author(s) and the original publisher.

CC BY-NC 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Shared article.
Original title
THE EFFICACY OF LASER THERAPY IN LABIAL FRENULECTOMY COMPARED WITH CONVETIONAL SURGERY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Author
Giulia Maria Nicoletti
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-05-15
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.4-179

Abstract

Background: Labial frenulectomy is one of the frequently utilized procedures to treat complications froma tight or projecting labial frenulum that can hinder speech, oral hygiene, or orthodontic care. The surgery has traditionally used a scalpel. But laser therapy has emerged in popularity because of its minimally invasive character and enhanced patient comfort. This review discusses the comparison between laser therapy and the traditional method of surgery with regard to clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. Methods: A thorough search was conducted using three major databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies that compared laser-assisted and traditional surgical approaches for labial frenulectomy. The review focused on differences in pain levels, bleeding, healing duration, procedure time, and post-surgical complications. Results: Out of a total of 226 studies found in an initial search, 7 were included on the basis of predetermined criteria. The majority of studies included in the reviews stated that laser therapy led to less bleeding, rapid healing, less postoperative discomfort and shorter surgery times. Variability in study design, laser type and the means of evaluating outcomes rendered comparisons difficult. Conclusion: Laser therapy would seem to have a number of advantages over conventional methods of surgery in terms of patient comfort and recovery time. Despite this, current evidence is weak. Stronger, well-conducted studies are required to fully evaluate long-term efficacy and to formalize standardized best practice.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates