Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
2025; 362–371
Shared with The Gufo

ASSESSMENT OF NUMBER, SHAPE, LENGTH, ORIENTATION, AND UNION OF PALATAL RUGAE ACROSS DIFFERENT SAGITTAL MALOCCLUSION TYPES: A DIAGNOSTIC PERSPECTIVE

1Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College & Hospital affiliated to Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute Chennai 600 095, India. · Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College & Hospital affiliated to Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute Chennai 600 095, India. · Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai 600 095, India. · Private Dental Practitioner, Chennai, India · Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Thai Moogambigai Dental College & Hospital affiliated to Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute Chennai 600 095, India.

Received: 2025-09-29 · Published: 2025-08-25

Shared article.
Original title
ASSESSMENT OF NUMBER, SHAPE, LENGTH, ORIENTATION, AND UNION OF PALATAL RUGAE ACROSS DIFFERENT SAGITTAL MALOCCLUSION TYPES: A DIAGNOSTIC PERSPECTIVE
Authors
Poorna Devadoss, Ramachandra Prabhakar, Umamaheshwari R, Saravanan R, J Susan Roy, Pradeep Christopher
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-08-25
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.7-362

Abstract

Background: Palatal rugae are unique anatomical structures located on the anterior part of the hard palate, characterized by individual morphological stability and variability. Their potential role in orthodontic diagnosis and forensic identification has garnered increasing attention. While previous studies have explored specific rugae traits, few have comprehensively analyzed multiple characteristics across different sagittal malocclusion types, genders, and treatment phases. Aim: To evaluate and compare the number, shape, length, orientation, and union of palatal rugae among individuals with different sagittal malocclusion types (Class I, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III), across genders and between pre-orthodontic and post-orthodontic treatment stages. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional clinical study involved 300 participants, aged 18 to 28 years, divided equally into three groups based on untreated sagittal malocclusion: Class I, Class II, and Class III, according to Angle’s classification. Key parameter that includes number, shape, length, orientation, and presence of union across different malocclusion classes were assessed and statistically analyzed using Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 26.0. Results: Rugae number significantly varied across malocclusion types (p = 0.002), with the highest count observed in Class II Division 2 and the lowest in Class III. Females exhibited a significantly higher rugae count than males (p = 0.021). Rugae length showed no significant changes between pre- and post-treatment stages (p > 0.05). Shape distribution differed significantly by malocclusion class (p = 0.049), with wavy and curved patterns dominating specific groups. Orientation patterns were also significantly associated with malocclusion types (p = 0.034), with posterior orientation more frequent in Class III and Class II Division 2. The presence of rugae union was rare and statistically insignificant across groups. Conclusion: Palatal rugae characteristics-particularly number, shape, and orientation—demonstrate significant diagnostic associations with sagittal malocclusion types and gender. Their morphological stability across treatment stages supports their utility as a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic adjunct in orthodontics and a valuable tool in forensic identification.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates