Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
ISSN 1829-006X
2025; 251–254
Shared with The Gufo

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF FLOWABLE COMPOSITE TO BE USED AS RESTORATIVE MATERIAL FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE DENTISTRY

Received: 2025-12-25 · Published: 2025-12-15

Shared article.
Original title
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF FLOWABLE COMPOSITE TO BE USED AS RESTORATIVE MATERIAL FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE DENTISTRY
Author
Elanthendral Saravanan
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-12-15
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.11-251

Abstract

Background:Dental restorative materials aim to replicate the structural and aesthetic properties of natural teeth. Flowable composites, with advancements in filler technology, offer enhanced adaptability and versatility for minimally invasive dentistry. Newer formulations like GC G-Aenial Universal Injectable and Ivoclar Tetric N-Flow have expanded their applications. This study evaluates their compressive strength to assess suitability for stressbearing restorations. Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the compressive strength of GC Aenial with Ivoclar flowable composite as a restorative material. Materials and Methods: Cylindrical moulds were used to fabricate 10 samples each of GC Aenial and Ivoclar Tetric N-Flow composite. Then, samples were tested for evaluation of compressive strength using Universal Testing Machine (UTM). This was connected to a load measuring cell, which continuously recorded the load applied to the samples at a crosshead speed of 1mm per 1 minute till the samples fractured. Results: The values were recorded and subjected to statistical analysis for comparison of compressive strength (MPa) between the two materials using SPSS software. In order to compare the means of two materials, Mann Whitney Test was used. The results of the study showed that there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that both GC G-aenial and Ivoclar Tetric-N flow composite can also be used as a restorative material since its compressive strength was found to be statistically significant. However, long term clinical studies are required to draw any substantial conclusion.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates