Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
ISSN 1829-006X
2025; 41–45
Shared with The Gufo

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LOW LEVEL LASER AND INJECTABLE PLATELET RICH FIBRIN ON THE RATE OF CANINE RETRACTION.

Aya Elsayed Nasef*, Samir Ibrahim, Abeer Gawish, Basma Hassaneen, Omneya Ahmed

Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls Al Azhar University, Assistant lecturer at orthodontic department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt · Professor and head of Orthodontic department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egyp · Professor of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis, and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt · Lecturer at Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt · Lecturer of oral Medicine, Periodontology, oral Diagnosis and Radiology Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls .Al-Azhar university, Cairo Egypt

Received: 2026-04-08 · Published: 2025-07-07

© 2025 The Author(s) and the original publisher.

CC BY-NC 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Shared article.
Original title
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LOW LEVEL LASER AND INJECTABLE PLATELET RICH FIBRIN ON THE RATE OF CANINE RETRACTION.
Authors
Aya Elsayed Nasef, Samir Ibrahim, Abeer Gawish, Basma Hassaneen, Omneya Ahmed
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-07-07
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.6-41

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of LLLT and I-PRF on the rate of maxillary canine retraction following first premolar extraction. Methods: A clinical study was conducted on 28 female patients divided into two equal groups. In Group 1 (n=14), LLLT was applied to the right maxillary canine, while the left served as a control. In Group 2 (n=14), I-PRF was injected around the right maxillary canine, with the left side as control. Canine retraction was measured monthly over four months using casts that were fabricated and then scanned with a 3D scanner Results: Group 1, the LLL side (right), showed a statistically significant higher rate of canine retraction than the control side (left); group 2, I-PRF, showed a statistically significant higher rate of canine retraction over the control side (left). LLLT resulted in a significantly higher rate of movement over the four-month observation period. Conclusion: In both groups the experimental side showed accelerated canine movement compared to the control side, the LLL yielded higher rate of canine movement when compared to I-PRF.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates