Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
ISSN 1829-006X
2025; 294–301
Shared with The Gufo

COMPARING BUCCAL FAT PAD AND NASOLABIAL FLAP APPROACHES FOR ORAL SUBMUCOUS FIBROSIS RECONSTRUCTION

Sajjad Salam*, Sarvesh R Kokare, Nand Karmali, Roopav Nargotra, Joseph, Avior Awaskar, Anukriti Kumari

Dental and Maxillofacial Services, Bahrain Defense Force Hospital, Bahrain Defense Forces - Military Hospital. · Postgraduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India · Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Phulo Jhano Medical College, Dumka, Jharkhand, India. · Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Government Dental College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India · Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India · Post Graduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sinhgad Dental College And Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India · Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Received: 2026-04-08 · Published: 2025-05-31

© 2025 The Author(s) and the original publisher.

CC BY-NC 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Shared article.
Original title
COMPARING BUCCAL FAT PAD AND NASOLABIAL FLAP APPROACHES FOR ORAL SUBMUCOUS FIBROSIS RECONSTRUCTION
Authors
Sajjad Salam, Sarvesh R Kokare, Nand Karmali, Roopav Nargotra, Joseph, Avior Awaskar, Anukriti Kumari
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-05-31
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.4-294

Abstract

Objective:This study evaluated and compared the effectiveness of the buccal fat pad and nasolabial flap techniques in surgically treating oral submucous fibrosis, with emphasis on improvements in mouth opening and oral commissure width after surgery. Materials and Methods:Twenty patients with clinically confirmed oral submucous fibrosis and a mouth opening less than 20 mm were included. They were divided equally into two groups: Group 1 (10 patients) received treatment with a nasolabial flap, while Group 2 (10 patients) was managed using the buccal fat pad. Measurements of incisal mouth opening and oral commissural width were taken before and after surgery. Data analysis was conducted using paired and unpaired t-tests, considering p-values ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant. Results:Both surgical interventions resulted in significant postoperative increases in mouth opening and commissural width. Notably, patients in the buccal fat pad group exhibited a more pronounced improvement in these parameters at the 6-month postoperative mark compared to those treated with the nasolabial flap. Conclusion:The nasolabial flap and buccal fat pad both serve as viable surgical methods for managing oral submucous fibrosis. The buccal fat pad demonstrated superior functional outcomes in terms of mouth opening and commissural width, although nasolabial flaps remain an effective treatment alternative. Keywords: Buccal fat pad, commissural width, mouth opening, nasolabial flap, Oral submucous fibrosis.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates