Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
ISSN 1829-006X
2025; 14–18
Shared with The Gufo

EFFICACY OF COLLAGEN POUCH VS STANDARD REPAIR IN SINUS MEMBRANE HEALING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Received: 2026-04-08 · Published: 2025-09-20

Shared article.
Original title
EFFICACY OF COLLAGEN POUCH VS STANDARD REPAIR IN SINUS MEMBRANE HEALING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Author
Ahmad Othman
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-09-20
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.9-14

Abstract

Background:Schneiderian membrane perforation is the most frequent complication during lateral-window sinus augmentation. While standard repair (collagen patch ± suturing/glue) is widely used, the collagen pouch (Loma Linda) technique may better isolate graft material and promote early healing. Comparative data on healing and graft containment remain limited. Materials and Methods: Prospective comparative study at Taibah University Dental College and Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia. Adults with intraoperative perforation during lateral-window augmentation were assigned by a preset size/location algorithm to collagen pouch or standard repair. Primary outcome: membrane healing at 8–12 weeks (clinical/CBCT). Secondary outcomes: graft containment, bone gain at 6–9 months, sinonasal complications ≤3 months, and implant survival 6–12 months. CBCT reads were blinded; effect sizes reported with 95% CIs. Results: Sixty-two patients were included (31 per arm). Collagen pouch improved early outcomes: healing 96.8% vs 80.6% (risk ratio 1.20; risk difference 16.1%); faster recovery (median 8 vs 10 weeks); and superior graft containment (100% vs 87.1%). Bone gain was similar (8.5 ± 1.6 vs 8.1 ± 1.8 mm) and short-term implant survival remained high in both groups (96.0% vs 95.8%), with fewer sinonasal events in the pouch cohort. Conclusions: Findings support a size-/site-based algorithm favoring collagen pouch for larger or complex tears, while standard patching remains adequate for small, favorable defects.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates