Australasian Journal of Information Systems
ISSN 1449-8618
1998
Shared — curated by The Gufo editorial team

Evaluation of Workflow Management Systems - A Meta Model Approach

Received: 2026-11-01 · Published: 1998-11-01

Curated by The Gufo editorial team.

Originally published in Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 1998 — https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v6i1.322.

Plain-language summary

Original title
Evaluation of Workflow Management Systems - A Meta Model Approach
Authors
Michael Rosemann, Michael Zur Muehlen
Source journal
Australasian Journal of Information Systems
Published
1998-11-01
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 2.5 Generic
Original
https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v6i1.322

Authors and publishers can request removal at any time via Copyright infringement; we act within 48 hours.

Abstract

The automated enactment of processes through the use of workflow management systems enables the outsourcing of the control flow from application systems. By now a large number of systems, that follow different workflow paradigms, are available. This leads to the problem of selecting the appropriate workflow management system for a given situation. In this paper we outline the benefits of a meta model approach for the evaluation and comparison of different workflow management systems. After a general introduction on the topic of meta modeling the meta models of the workflow management systems WorkParty (Siemens Nixdorf) and FlowMark (IBM) are compared as an example. These product specific meta models can be generalized to meta reference models, which helps to specify a workflow methodology. Exemplary, an organisational reference meta model is presented, which helps users in specifying their requirements for a workflow management system.

1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates