Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
ISSN 1829-006X
2026; 160–166
Shared with The Gufo

IMPACT OF CONVENTIONAL VERSUS GUIDED FIBER-POST REMOVAL TECHNIQUES ON THE FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH: AN IN-VITRO STUDY

Received: 2026-01-08 · Published: 2026-12-31

Shared article.
Original title
IMPACT OF CONVENTIONAL VERSUS GUIDED FIBER-POST REMOVAL TECHNIQUES ON THE FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH: AN IN-VITRO STUDY
Author
Raneen Alaa Saker
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2026-12-31
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.12-160

Abstract

Background: Removing fiber posts during endodontic retreatment remains challenging due to their strong adhesive bonding to radicular dentin, which increases the risk of excessive dentin loss and structural compromise. Guided endodontic navigation has recently gained attention as a technique capable of enhancing precision and minimizing iatrogenic damage. Aim:To compare and asses the fracture resistance of teeth following fiber-post removal using two techniques conventional freehand removal and static guided endodontic navigation using two instrument systems: ultrasonic tips and Endo Tracer burs. Materials and Methods: 36 human extracted mandibular premolars with standardized morphology were prepared using a rotary nickel– titanium system and root canal filled using the single obturation cone technique and AH Plus root canal sealer. Fiber posts (0.8 mm, 2% taper) were cemented using dual-cure resin cement. Teeth got mounted in custom U-shaped epoxy resin molds simulating the dental arch. Group I underwent conventional freehand post removal, while Group I used static guided navigation designed through the merging of CBCT and optical surface scans. Groups were further subdivided into two subgroups in accordance with the instrument type (ultrasonic tip ET18D or Endo Tracer bur). Fracture resistance was then measured with the use of an Instron Universal Testing device. Finally, data was by using two-way ANOVA and independent t-test. Results: Guided navigation significantly increased fracture resistance compared to the conventional technique (p < 0.001). Ultrasonic instrumentation demonstrated higher fracture-resistance values than burs in both groups, with statistically significant differences within the guided technique (p = 0.005). No significant interaction was found between the technique and instrument type (p = 0.366). Conclusion: Static guided endodontic navigation preserved radicular dentin and resulted in significantly higher fracture resistance than conventional freehand post removal. Ultrasonic instruments exhibited superior performance compared with burs. Guided navigation represents a safer and more conservative approach for fiber-post removal.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates