Site logo
Natural Sciences, Stomotology, 2026

PERI-IMPLANTITIS, CONTEMPORARY TREATMENT STRATEGIES – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Submitted: 2026-08-17
CC BY-NC 4.0 This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Abstract

Background:Peri-implantitis is a prevalent biological complication affecting dental implants and is characterized by inflammatory destruction of peri-implant tissues and progressive peri-implant bone loss. Despite the high survival rates of implant therapy, peri-implantitis remains a major clinical challenge that may compromise long-term implant stability and survival. Objective:This systematic review aimed to evaluate current evidence regarding the classification, etiology, risk factors, clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, and prevention strategies associated with peri-implantitis. Methods:A systematic literature search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched for relevant studies. Clinical studies evaluating non-surgical, surgical, and regenerative treatment approaches for peri-implantitis were included. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in probing depth, bleeding on probing, radiographic peri-implant bone changes, and implant survival rates. The methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies were assessed using appropriate validated assessment tools according to study design. Results:A total of 142 records were identified, of which 55 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Non-surgical interventions demonstrated clinical benefits mainly in cases of early and moderate peri-implantitis, whereas surgical and regenerative approaches provided improved outcomes in patients with advanced peri-implant defects. Long-term supportive peri-implant maintenance was associated with reduced disease progression and improved implant stability. However, considerable heterogeneity was observed among studies regarding diagnostic criteria, treatment protocols, follow-up periods, and outcome assessment methods. Conclusion:The management of peri-implantitis requires early diagnosis, comprehensive risk-factor control, and individualized treatment strategies combining preventive measures, non-surgical therapy, surgical interventions, and supportive maintenance. Further well-designed clinical studies with standardized diagnostic criteria and outcome measures are required to establish evidence-based treatment protocols and improve long-term implant outcomes.

Subscribe to TheGufo Newsletter​