2023; WISDOM 4(28), 2023: 90–100
Shared with The Gufo

Philosophical and Theoretical Aspects of Court-Notary Interaction: Current Relationships in the Provision of Evidence

Alexander BEGICHEV*, Evgenia FROLOVA

Received: 2024-10-10 · Published: 2023-12-25

© 2023 The Author(s) and the original publisher.

CC BY-NC 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Shared article.
Original title
Philosophical and Theoretical Aspects of Court-Notary Interaction: Current Relationships in the Provision of Evidence
Authors
Alexander BEGICHEV, Evgenia FROLOVA
Published
2023-12-25
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1038

Abstract

The article examines the modern relationship be-tween the interactionof the court and the notary when taking measures to ensure evidence. In particular, it is indicated that when providing evidence, these bodies are guided by the norms of civil procedural legislation and implement similar goals aimed at fixing factual circumstances of legal signifi-cance in a procedural form. It is emphasized that their compe-tence touches, moreover, the notary, as it were, replaces the court in the implementation of interim measures. One of the tasks of the effective activity of the notary is to relieve the ju-dicial system from the consideration of local and time-consuming issues, which are solved, as a rule, without the ap-plication of the principle of adversarial parties, including the provision of evidence on the Internet. Thus, the potential of unloading the court is excluded from its competence to solve problems that do not relate to the administration of justice.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates