Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
2025; 369–377
Shared with The Gufo

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSVERSE BASAL ARCH WIDTH AND MOLAR INCLINATION: A CBCT STUDY IN YEMENI ADULTS

Badr Dammag*, Naela Mogahed

Postgraduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, Pedodontics and Prevention, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen. · Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Pedodontics and Prevention, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen

Received: 2025-09-17 · Published: 2025-09-13

© 2025 The Author(s) and the original publisher.

CC BY-NC 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Shared article.
Original title
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSVERSE BASAL ARCH WIDTH AND MOLAR INCLINATION: A CBCT STUDY IN YEMENI ADULTS
Authors
Badr Dammag, Naela Mogahed
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-09-13
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.8-369

Abstract

Background: Transverse skeletal discrepancies in adults are often underdiagnosed, particularly when masked by dentoalveolar compensation such as molar inclination. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between transverse basal arch width and molar angulation in Yemeni adults using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: A retrospective CBCT analysis was conducted on 87 untreated Yemeni adults (17–40 years). Participants were classified into normal and narrow maxilla groups based on the maxillary–mandibular basal width difference (Mx–Mn). Skeletal widths were measured on standardized basal planes, and first molar inclination was recorded relative to skeletal reference lines. Group comparisons were performed using t-tests, while correlations were assessed with Pearson’s r. Intra-examiner reliability was verified with ICC. Results: The narrow maxilla group demonstrated a significantly smaller maxillary width (54.55 ± 2.8 mm) than the normal group (57.55 ± 3.1 mm; p < 0.001), accompanied by a greater mandibular width (57.5 ± 3.3 vs. 55.2 ± 3.1 mm; p = 0.003), resulting in a negative Mx–Mn difference. Upper molars exhibited greater buccal inclination (195.2° ± 11.4 vs. 189.8° ± 7.2; p = 0.028), whereas lower molars showed more lingual inclination (146.3° ± 10.6 vs. 155.1° ± 8.5; p < 0.001). Strong correlations were found between Mx–Mn and molar inclination (upper r = +0.535; lower r = −0.463; both p < 0.001). ICC exceeded 0.90. Conclusion: Molar inclination functions as a compensatory mechanism in the presence of transverse skeletal imbalance. Incorporating both skeletal and dental assessments through CBCT enhances the detection of concealed transverse disharmony and facilitates more individualized orthodontic treatment planning.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates