Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
ISSN 1829-006X
2025; 60–76
Shared with The Gufo

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTIC REGIMENS AND POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES FOLLOWING PEDIATRIC ADENOTONSILLECTOMY

Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical College, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Received: 2026-04-10 · Published: 2025-12-27

Shared article.
Original title
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTIC REGIMENS AND POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES FOLLOWING PEDIATRIC ADENOTONSILLECTOMY
Authors
Abdullah Alarfaj, Khalid AlYahya
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-12-27
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.12-60

Abstract

Background: Adenotonsillectomy is among the most common pediatric surgical procedures globally. Despite advances in perioperative care, prophylactic antibiotic use remains widespread, often without strong supporting evidence. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic regimens in improving postoperative outcomes among pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Methods: This review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251079815). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL, targeting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies published between 2000 and 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on studies assessing the impact of prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo or no antibiotic on outcomes such as pain, hemorrhage, fever, infection, and return to normal diet in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane ROB2 tool, and results were synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity in study protocols and outcome definitions. Results: Fourteen studies involving over 2,500 pediatric patients were included. The majority of trials reported no significant differences in postoperative pain, fever, or hemorrhage rates between antibiotic and control groups. A few studies demonstrated marginal benefits in infection control, particularly in low-resource settings, but these were offset by concerns regarding adverse effects and antimicrobial resistance. Overall, the findings support current recommendations against routine prophylactic antibiotic use in pediatric adenotonsillectomy. Conclusion: Prophylactic antibiotic administration does not provide consistent or clinically meaningful benefits in reducing complications following pediatric adenotonsillectomy. These findings underscore the need for judicious antibiotic prescribing and support global antimicrobial stewardship initiatives in surgical settings.
Follow Updates