Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
ISSN 1829-006X
2025; 294–334
Shared with The Gufo

MATERIALS USED IN TEMPORARY ANCHORAGE DEVICES (TADS)

SRM Dental College · SRM Dental College Ramapuram, Chennai- 600089

Received: 2026-04-08 · Published: 2025-11-09

Shared article.
Original title
MATERIALS USED IN TEMPORARY ANCHORAGE DEVICES (TADS)
Authors
Aashik, K. RAVI
Source journal
Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-11-09
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Original
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.10-295

Abstract

Background:Tooth replacement concepts date back to the 18th century, but predictable skeletal anchorage was established only after Brånemark’s discovery of osseointegration in 1964, making titanium the gold standard. Orthodontic miniscrews, first introduced by Kanomi in 1997, expanded anchorage options and applications. Implant biomaterials are broadly classified as biotolerant (stainless steel, cobalt–chromium), bioinert (titanium, carbon), and bioactive (hydroxyapatite, ceramics), each differing in tissue response from fibrous encapsulation to direct bone contact or chemical bonding, which directly influences the success of temporary anchorage devices. Materials and Methods: A PRISMA-based systematic review was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect (1913–2024), with manual reference checks. Eligible studies included experimental and clinical research on mini-implant materials and their properties. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed quality using CONSORT and STROBE. Owing to heterogeneity, results were qualitatively synthesized by material type and application. Results: Mini-implants have advanced significantly, becoming reliable TADs for various orthodontic applications. Titanium and its alloys demonstrated the best stability, biocompatibility, and corrosion resistance, while stainless steel, cobalt–chromium, and ceramics offered alternative but less predictable outcomes. Success was influenced by implant design, bone quality, insertion torque, and surface modifications. Recent innovations, including nanotechnology-based surface treatments and digital placement methods, further improved osseointegration, antibacterial properties, and overall clinical predictability. Conclusion: Mini-implants provide stable, compliance-free anchorage and have become essential in modern orthodontics. Titanium remains the gold standard, while advances in surface modifications and nanotechnology continue to improve their effectiveness and safety.
1 / ? 100% Open in new tab Download Cite

Loading the full text…

Download Follow Updates